Angry Papadopoulos slams Harris, denies he proposed payment stoppage


By Stelios Orphanides

A war of words has broken out between Finance Minister Harris Georgiades and Diko leader and presidential candidate Nicolas Papadopoulos after the latter proposed to delay debt repayments and so help social groups struck by the crisis.

Georgiades, a member of ruling Disy, the party of incumbent president Nicos Anastasiades, alleged that Papadopoulos, who is proposing to compensate bondholders and depositors for their losses suffered in the 2013 bailout, proposed a payment stoppage in order to make good on his election promises.

“What Papadopoulos promises here and there cannot be covered with the surplus of a budget but require a second and a third budget,” Georgiades said in an interview with state-radio CyBC on Thursday. “When he was asked by a journalist where all these hundreds of millions needed will be found, he said it wouldn’t be the end of the world to delay debt repayment. This can be interpreted as a payment stoppage”.

Georgiades was referring to an interview given by Papadopoulos to Cyprus’s Alpha TV on Monday.

“What we are proposing is not to take out funds form the state budget which will deprive other important programmes but to delay repaying public debt,” the Diko chairman, who is known for his populist rhetoric in economic policy issues and his hard-line in the Cyprus Problem. “It will not be the end of the world if the repayment of public debt is delayed by some years, but it will give a break to some fellow citizens who paid a heavy price for the country to exit the crisis”.

The comment prompted a caustic statement by Georgiades on Tuesday, accusing Papadopoulos for the first time of suggesting a payment stoppage.

The chairman of Diko hit back on Thursday, also talking on CyBC radio, saying his comments had been “maliciously” distorted.

“There is a degree of hypocrisy in the comments of the Anastasiades team with respect to our proposal,” Papadopoulos complained in the radio interview and added he had not proposed not to timely repay Cyprus’s debt to its official creditors who financed the 2013 bailout.

“But there is debt to third parties such as semi-governmental organisations, the Co-op, other entities,” he said adding that the Anastasiades government was allowed to extend the maturity of this debt as part of the bailout deal.

What he proposes, he continued, is a new extension of those maturities.

“What they (Disy and the government) are telling us is that only the Anastasiades government can utilise our country’s surplus to make grants to football clubs or the owners of immovable property, and inject €25m into a fund to compensate depositors and bondholders but we are not allowed to do that,” he said. “(But) if we do this, (then) it will lead to a payment stoppage. Whoever takes these facts into account realises that criticism is not in good faith”.

Georgiades, who oversaw Cyprus’s fiscal consolidation after assuming his job in April 2013, days after Cyprus agreed the terms of the onerous bailout which allowed the government to regain market access in 2015, four years after being shut out, said that “what Papadopoulos promises here and there cannot be covered with the surplus of a budget but requires a second and a third one”.

Two economists interviewed on the matter said that while negotiating an extension of a debt maturity is not equal to a payment stoppage, it may be considered a credit incident which could negatively impact Cyprus’s sovereign credit rating.

On the other hand, it could be easily evaded by issuing another security to repay maturing debt, he said.


“The whole discussion proves that politicians have not learned how to debate,” one of the interviewed economists said.


About Author

Stelios Orphanides is a journalist at To contact Stelios Orphanides: [email protected]

  • Disenchanted

    Baby Pap is becoming a toddler, it’s only normal to have tantrums.

  • Cydee

    This country was rescued by the Eu in 2013 due to years of ignoring debts. God help us if this man gets presidency.

  • Philippos

    Either way, the money has to be found in order to compensate a specific slice of the community at the expense of others and now it seems, a risk to our appreciating credit rating internationally. Georgiades is right and I object to my money being given to others by someone who has not asked me or consulted me. I lost money in The Crisis, but i was investing and it was a risk, so you don’t hear me crying for a handout. Papadopoulos popularism sucks and sets a bad tone for any “Presidency” that he might wheedle his way into. Sadly there are a great number of people who have forgotten their risk taking and just want a handout and don’t care where it comes from or who it hurts. That’s Cyprus today, for you and if it doesn’t change we shall see that we are done for or we’ll leave that one for our children maybe

  • Mist

    How many people here say to the politicos “I will vote for you” take their “shilling” and then vote for someone else?

  • almostbroke

    Baby dosent mind bandying around the taxpayers money to further his Presidental ambition s . But they are all ‘at it ‘ who cares as long as the politicians use the taxpayers money , their own is in a nice safe place , Baby won’t be using his own hard earnered ‘facilitating ‘ money that’s for sure !

  • JS Gost

    Cyprus, remember, baby pap would sell his mother to get to the high chair…..sod the country, it’s all about me….